Normally, I don’t read a book just because it was banned or
challenged. I carouse titles and skim through books and if I see something I
like, I make a note of it. However, for one of my classes I had to read Bapsi
Sidhwa’s Cracking India. (If I was to
personally leaf through it, in all honesty I would have just set the book aside
and kept looking.) But while reading the book for class, I found out that it
was a “banned book” in 2006; this is what eventually piqued my interest.
Cracking India is
about story that’s focused on the polio-stricken narrator, 8 year-old Lenny,
and the events that she witnesses in Lahore during the 1947 partition of India.
There are some heartfelt moments scattered within the text; Lenny is not only
coming of age in a dreadful time period, but practically during a time of
social unrest and you can sympathize, laugh, and cry with her as she
experiences new emotions for the first time. But truth be told, there are lots
of explicit details regarding sex, violence, and the monstrosities surrounding
the dividing of the British Indian subcontinent into India & Pakistan.
Almost close to 12.5 million people were displaced and there was a lot of
religious-fueled genocide that is described in the book. Overall, it’s not a
book for the weak-hearted.
The book was challenged because “a parent objected to atwo-page scene in which the narrator brushes off an older cousin's attempt totrick her into performing oral sex”.
I was wondering to myself after reading the book, “Really? This is the only reason why they wanted
the book banned?” I found it not surprising that the book was challenged, but why the book was challenged. The parents
did not contest to the religious violence that was expanded upon, nor about the
blatant abuse towards women specifically. To me, it seemed that there were so
many other issues that could have been brought up, but this one seemed so unnecessary.
-Judy
No comments:
Post a Comment